Corporate Irresponsibility Taken to New Heights. Are You Going to be The Next Victim?

June 10th, 2010

We are entering an era where corporate irresponsibility will be taken to new heights.  As Emeril says “to notches previously unknown.” How can this happen? The thought that has been superimposed upon the general public is that businesses are failing because of frivolous lawsuits. Frivolous lawsuits are ruining the country. Unfortunately, that translates into the belief that all lawsuits are frivolous. There is a distrust of anyone who brings a lawsuit for injuries and damages these days. The injured person is no longer viewed as an unfortunate victim of negligence. The injured victim is seen as a money grubbing person out to strike it rich. Instead, in today’s society, it is the negligent business that is viewed as the victim. The unfortunate business that has to endure a lawsuit by a personal injury trial lawyer.

That pervasive attitude is the result of a long-running and ongoing multi-billion dollar campaign by insurance companies and big business. The goal is to crush the rights of the little guy. To close the courthouse doors to the common everyday person. Another goal is to generate larger corporate profits. Not only by eliminating lawsuits for the corporation’s negligence, but to also allow the corporation conduct business in an unfettered manner. No more worries about corporate responsibility getting in the way. Take whatever course of action it chooses and the corporation can generate larger profits and not have to worry about the victims it leaves in its wake. Examples that are just starting to come to light are in the housing lending schemes and the Wall Street bailouts. We see examples in the newspapers every month on examples from China where unsafe and harmful products are placed on the market because of a complete failure of any regulation or standards. Merely a profit motive is operating as the only anchor. We have entire housing projects that are contaminated with unsafe and hazardous Chinese drywall. McDonald’s Corporation just had to recall all of the promotional drinking glasses it was giving away because they were made with a deadly chemical. At the present time we see a disaster of unknown proportions unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico as oil continues to spew into the Gulf. Time will only tell whether BP and the other responsible corporations will meet their responsibilities or whether they will seek to avoid their responsibilities through claim denials and years and years of litigation.

On a smaller scale, here is another example. A life insurance company receives a claim under a life insurance policy. The life insurance company informs the beneficiary of the life insurance policy that it is going to conduct an investigation. The beneficiary cooperates fully by providing all documents and records requested. The beneficiary gives a recorded statement. The beneficiary completes questionnaires and forms. The claim is accepted. The beneficiary receives a check for the payment of the life insurance policy.

Nine months later the beneficiary receives a letter saying that the life insurance company made a mistake. No specific mistake is stated or indicated. There is no allegation of fraud or that the beneficiary did not cooperate or gave false information. The letter just says the company made a mistake. Because the life insurance company allegedly mader some mistake, the life insurance company demanded that the beneficiary send the money from the life insurance policy back to the company.

What if the money is gone? What if the money has been spent? What if the money has been invested? How and why should the beneficiary have to pay it back? The life insurance company gave it to the beneficiary. It said, here it is, it is yours. Where is the corporate responsibility? If the life insurance company made a mistake shouldn’t it have to live with it? Shouldn’t the life insurance company have to accept the negligence of its employees’ actions. Instead of accepting the fact that it paid the money, wrongly or rightly, the insurance company refuses to accept responsibility. Isn’t the real answer the same thing we would teach our children? Accept the consequences of your actions. Grow up and learn to be a responsible citizen. It is time for us and our corporations to learn and live by the lessons we teach our children. Start taking responsibility for your actions. Fess up and pay up when you are wrong. Your mom, or in the case of corporations, your PR Firm and multi-million dollar ad campaign will not always be there to bail you out of the messes you create. Accept responsibility and make it right. Then learn a lesson from the mistake and don’t do it again.

More Support for My Stance Against Distracted Drivers

June 9th, 2010

For quite a while I have been clear in my warnings and pleas to stop distracted drivers. Yet every day I see people texting and talking on the phones while driving. Driving and paying attention is not their major focus or concern. They are ticking time bombs and accidents waiting to happen. In Las Vegas texting and driving is a recipe for disaster. Don’t do it. Stop and think. Stop and think of someone other than yourself. Do not ruin someone else’s life because you needed to send a text message while you were driving.

I recently reported that Oprah Winfrey joined in the battle against distracted drivers who are causing serious injuries across America. Today it is reported that physicians should tell their patients not to send text messages or use their cell phones while driving. In the New England Journal of Medicine doctors are asked to advise patients against texting and cell phones the same as they warn patients against smoking or supporting the use of seat belts.

In addition to the article instructing doctors to warn patients against driving and texting, the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation approved the Distracted Driving Prevention Act. The Distracted Driving Prevention Act provides incentives to states with distracted driving regulations. According to the Senator who co-sponsored the bill, “It’s a proven fact that distracted driving causes thousands of deaths and injuries every year.”

It is time for Nevada to ban texting while driving. It is time for Nevada to ban talking on a cell phone unless the driver has a hands free device. If you are in Las Vegas and you cause an accident and injure an innocent person because of your distracted driving, I will sue you for the injuries and damages you cause. With or without a distracted driver law in Nevada, i will seek punitive damages against you. That is extra money beyond my clients damages for injuries to punish you and make an example of you. That is money you will have to pay because your insurance does not cover you for punitive damage awards. Think about how much money your next text message is really worth while you are driving. Is the text message really so important that you are willing to risk your entire financial future for it. Is it worth a serious lifetime injury. Probably not. Just don’t do it.

Las Vegas Injury Lawyer tips: An Inexperienced Attorney Can Wreck Your Case.

June 8th, 2010

Here is another practical tip from Las Vegas injury lawyer and trial attorney Craig Murphy. An inexperienced attorney can wreck your case. Yes, that is true, and most people from Las Vegas would agree. But I do not merely mean an inexperienced attorney when I make this point. What I mean is that when choosing an attorney for a Las Vegas injury claim or a Las Vegas accident claim, you must hire a lawyer who has accident and injury experience. You just can not hire an attorney because he or she has been around for a number of years. The lawyer you hire in Las Vegas for your accident or injury claim must concentrate on accident and injury claims.

Why must you hire an attorney who is experienced in Las Vegas accident and injury claims? There a re a number of reasons. Let me give you some examples of people who went wrong in their decision to hire a Las Vegas attorney for their injury and accident claims. The first example comes from an experience I had. I had just taken a significant injury case to trial in Las Vegas. After presenting the case, the jury returned a very significant verdict in favor of my client. The trial had taken over a week to present to the jury. Shortly after the trial I received a telephone call from another Las Vegas attorney. The attorney did not normally handle accident and injury cases. The attorney was primarily a business attorney. The LasVegas business attorney thought that the case would be an easy case to settle. However, the attorney was wrong. The insurance company did not want to settle the case. I do not know the reason that the insurance company refused to settle. However, I suspect that it was due in part to the fact that the business attorney had not properly prepared the case. The Las Vegas business attorney did not want to pay all of the expenses that were necessary to properly prepare the case. As a result, the attorney just did not do it. The Las Vegas business attorney called me because the attorney wanted me to take the case over and take it to trial within two weeks. 

Upon questioning the Las Vegas business attorney, it was apparent that the case had not been properly prepared.  The attorney thought that the case would settle, so the attorney did not spend any money getting the case ready for trial.  The Las Vegas business attorney did not hire any expert witnesses. The Las Vegas business attorney had not properly identified the treating doctors as witnesses and a motion was pending to exclude all of the treating doctors from testifying at trial. There was nothing I could do and I was unable to take that case over for the LasVegas injury victim. In all cases there comes a time where nothing further can be done to salvage a case from improper or inadequate preparation. This case had passed that point long before the business attorney called me. The business attorney knew it and was looking for someone to come to the rescue. The case was beyond rescue and I never heard how the case was ultimately resolved.

Another similar example involves an experienced Las Vegas criminal attorney. The preparation of a criminal case is much different than the preparation of an accident or injury case. There is no or very little discovery in a criminal case. Discovery is a key element of a Las Vegas injury and accident case. The criminal lawyer had not conducted any discovery in the case. That, in and of itself, is not fatal to a case. However, it does not help. One of the biggest differences and problems that exist when a criminal lawyer tries to handle an accident or injury case is the differences in philosophy. In a criminal case the criminal lawyer does not bear the burden of proof. All the criminal lawyer has to do is convince one juror that reasonable doubt exists. The Las Vegas criminal lawyer only has to create doubt in one person. In an accident and injury case, the Plaintiff, you and your attorney, must convince at least 6 people of your case. You have the burden of proof. If you fail to meet your burden of proof, you do not win the case. This major fundamental difference can not be over come by a criminal lawyer. The criminal lawyer cannot over come the mind set. Many elements of the case can often be left out or overlooked as a result.

Similarly, attorneys who are insurance defense attorneys often try to pick up accident and injury cases. Unfortunately, the Las Vegas insurance defense lawyers trying to take an accident or injury case have divided loyalty. They often hire the same experts that they hire to defend cases or they are opposed to experts that they usually use. As a result, they are reluctant to aggressively challenge the expert witness during deposition or at trial. In addition, it is very difficult to automatically switch hats. That is go from challenging every accident and injury case that comes across your desk to all of a sudden accepting the statements and validity of the accident and injury case. There can often be lingering doubts and skepticism of your case. It is human nature. Yet your Las Vegas accident and injury attorney is your advocate. Any doubts and skepticism will be noticed by the jury. You cannot afford divided loyalty.

In a Las Vegas accident or injury case, you must select the proper attorney for your case. You have virtually unlimited choices. Choose wisely because the decision to hire a lawyer for your Las Vegas accident or injury case will be one of the most important decisions that you make about your case. The attorney you choose can affect the outcome of the case. The attorney you choose can affect the value of your case.

When choosing a Las Vegas attorney for your Las Vegas accident or injury case, choose a lawyer who only represents Plaintiffs in injury cases. Do not hire a Las Vegas attorney who also works for insurance companies. Do not hire a criminal, business, transactional, bankruptcy, or wills lawyer for your LasVegas injury case. Do not hire lawyer who says he or she does a little bit of everything. You cannot afford a “Jack of all trades and master of none.” Only hire an experienced Las Vegas accident and injury lawyer. A lawyer who only does accident and injury cases. Nothing else. In addition, make sure that the Las Vegas accident and injury lawyer that you hire has the proper amount of experience. You must hire a layer who has gone to trial a received significant jury verdicts for accident and injury victims. You do not want a settlement lawyer or a settlement mill. If you hire a settlement mill or settlement lawyer, you will not be on equal footing with the insurance company. The insurance companies know better than anyone else who will file a lawsuit and go to trial and who will not. If your lawyer will not go to trial with your case, it is like going to a gun fight armed only with a knife. You have little chances of winning.

Your lawyer is your weapon. Make sure that you have the right weapon for the battle ahead. For your Las Vegas accident and injury case, only hire a skilled and experienced Las Vegas accident and injury trial lawyer with a proven track record of success.

Brain Injuries: Serious Life-Threatening Injuries can Happen Without Warning

May 28th, 2010

Brain injuries are more common than most people realize. Brain injuries range from minor to major. A minor brain injury may resolve after a short period of time. More significant brain injuries are life-long and life-altering. In America, it is estimated that 1.5 million brain injuries happen each year. Approximately 5 million people in the United States are living with the effects of a brain injury and require some degree of assistance as a result of the brain injury. Brain injuries account for more than 50,000 deaths in the United States per year.

I recently read a book by Zig Zigler and his daughter about the brain injury Zig suffered as a result of a fall down the stairs at his house.  The book documents his struggles and the struggles of his family members trying to adapt to the resultant effects of his brain injury. Zig documents how he continues to live life on his terms event though his life has been dramatically altered by a brain injury.

In the news today it was reported that child actor Gary Coleman died as a result of a brain injury. Apparently Mr. Coleman had a fall and hit his head. Following the fall he was reported to be in good condition and coherent. However, as the brain injury progressed, he fell into a coma and had to be placed upon life support. Reportedly the life support was removed and Mr. Coleman passed away.

The truth is that a minor fall or car crash can cause serious brain injuries. A car crash with minimal property damage can cause fatal or life-long injuries. The brain is very delicate. A minor fall or car crash can cause the brain to impact the inside of the skull, which has many sharp edges and protrusions. The impact can cause a brain bleed or subdural hematoma, a bleeding bruise inside the skull. In addition, the whiplash effect of a car crash or fall can cause internal tearing of the internal structures of the brain. Such tears, known as axonal sheering, can cause significant loss of brain function.

Many people who suffer brain injuries in a fall or car crash do not realize or admit their brain injury. It is the family members, co-workers and friends that notice the dramatic changes in the brain injured person’s personality, behavior and abilities. There may not be any evidence of the brain injury on a brain scan or MRI. However, the people closest to the brain injured person know that something has happened. Something is not the same. It can take a lot of detailed work to diagnose and treat such a brain injury. The effects of the brain injury affect every member of the injured person’s family, employment and relationships.

If you know someone you suspect has suffered a brain injury that has gone undiagnosed and untreated, please call someone experienced in dealing with brain injuries. Whether a lawyer orhealth care professional dedicated to brain injury diagnosis and treatment, they should be able to get you and your family member to the appropriate care facilities and health care providers. If you do not know where to turn, call my office. We will provide you with all of the assistance and information that we have.

Murphy & Murphy Law Offices: Looking out for you

May 27th, 2010

If you are familiar with Bill O’Reilly, you know that he says that he is looking out for you. But who is looking out for you locally? “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” is looking out for you locally, that’s who. So how is “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” looking out for you? Go to our website.  The “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” website at “nvpilaw.com” has a number of information pages that tell you specific things that you can do on a daily basis to protect you and your family and substantially reduce the chances of you or your family being injured in an accident. In addition to the information pages on the “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” website at “nvpilaw.com” I regularly have posts on this blog that provide additional ideas and information on what you can do to keep you and your family safe and reduce the chances of being injured or damaged.

If a family member, friend, or you have been injured in an accident, Craig Murphy, Esq. and the lawyers and staff at “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” look out for you in many ways. Unlike many law firms, Craig Murphy, Esq. and the lawyers and staff at “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” know you on a face-to-face, first name basis. You are not just a number or just another case to us. We are interested in you and we are looking out for your bests interests. If the insurance company will not agree to a fair and equitable resolution of your claim, we will file a law suit and protect your rights and interests through the American judicial system. Your claim will not be dropped because we do not have the knowledge and skill to litigate your case. On the contrary, Craig Murphy and the lawyers at “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” are skilled and experienced trial lawyers. We have the skill, knowledge and experience required to successfully take your case to trial if that is necessary. In many instances, the insurance companies will not offer a fair settlement until they know that your case has been prepared for trial and that your attorneys are ready, willing and able to take your case to trial before a jury of your peers. If you do not hire skilled and experienced trial lawyers to handle your case, the insurance company will not offer a fair settlement. In those instances, your lawyer will suggest that you take a pennies on the dollar settlement or the lawyer will withdraw from your case at the last minute. You will then be faced with a very difficult situation where you are involved in litigation and you do not have a lawyer to represent you.

Today Craig Murphy of “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” saw a new report that said regular use of tanning beds increases the chances of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer, by three of four times. Craig Murphy and “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” are looking out for you. If you use tanning beds, look up the reseach for your self. Then ask yourself, “is it worth the increased risk of deadly skin cancer to use a tanning bed?” The obvious answer is no. Stop using the tanning beds now. Do not go back. How can a tan be worth one moment taken from your life? How can a tan be worth months of pain and suffering with deadly cancer? How can a tan be worth the stress and mental anguish knowing that you have deadly skin cancer and that you have a very short time to live? If you have kids, how can a tan replace the importance of the kids having you in their lives? How could you face putting your kids through cancer treatment and the torment of losing a parent to skin cancer?

If you are not a parent but instead are an adolescent or young adult, stop using tanning beds. You have your whole life in front of you. You have everything in the world to look forward to. Do not risk cutting your life short for a tan. In all aspects of life, you will never eliminate the risk of injuries or harm. Sickness and disease are part of life. What we can do however is eliminate known risks of harm and danger. We can eliminate known risks of sickness and disease. Will that guarantee that we will never be harmed, get sick or suffer from a disease? No. But you can substantially reduce and eliminate the known risks. Thereby, you can increase the chances that you will lead a full, happy and healthy life.

That is how Craig Murphy and “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” are looking out for you. We provide you with information to help you in your daily lives. Little decisions can add up to big safety. Since “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices” is a Las Vegas personal injury law firm, we hope that you and your family never need our services. However, should you, a family member or friend ever be in need of legal services of any kind, call Craig Murphy at “Murphy & Murphy Law Offices.” He will answer any questions you have and try to help you with your legal needs.

Are You a Victim of Insurance Bad Faith?

May 18th, 2010

Are you a victim of insurance bad faith? How would you know or find out? First you must know what “insurance bad faith” is in Nevada. “Insurance bad faith” is defined by law. Some states have statutes or laws that define and govern what constitutes “insurance bad faith.” Other states, such as Nevada, do not have statutes or laws that define what constitutes “insurance bad faith.” Instead, case law has developed that establishes what practices, actions, and failures by an insurance company constitute “insurance bad faith.” Case law in Nevada establishes that an insurance company, under the insurance policy or contract, has an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing gives rise to a “bad faith” claim against the insurance company. The courts in Nevada have defined “insurance bad faith” as an actual or implied awareness of the absence of a reasonable basis for denying the benefits of the insurance policy.

Based upon Nevada case law, not every denial of an insurance claim is in “bad faith.” A denial of an insurance claim only rises to the level of “bad faith” when the insurance company does not have an actual or implied awareness of the absence of a reasonable basis for denying the claim. What does that mean to you? It means that if the insurance company can point to an actual reason for the denial of your claim, it has not acted in ”bad faith.” That is understandable. If there is no basis for your claim under the terms of the insurance policy, for example, there is no “bad faith” on the part of the insurance company in denying your claim. That is why it is so absolutely important that you know the terms and conditions of your insurance policies. As I previously explained in another blog post, the exclusions and restrictions in some policies severely limit the insurance company’s obligations to you. Often the coverage is so narrowly construed that the coverage may be of little or no actual benefit to you. Nevertheless, you pay an extra premium for the coverage.

“Insurance bad faith” also means that the insurance company was aware that there was no reasonable basis for the denial of your claim. That is the tricky part. In almost every “insurance bad faith” claim, the insurance company will argue that it had a reasonable basis for the denial of your claim. Even if you institute a lawsuit against the insurance company and it later pays your claim, the insurance company will argue that it had a reasonable basis for the denial of your claim.

“Insurance bad faith” litigation is a very specialized area of law. If you believe that your claim has been unreasonably denied, you must speak with an experienced “insurance bad faith” lawyer. You cannot afford to hire a generalist or “jack of all trades” attorney for an “insurance bad faith” case. The attorney you hire must have experience and a track record in “insurance bad faith” cases. Take your time and be selective in who you choose to hire. Hiring an attorney or law firm that is inexperienced in “insurance bad faith” will cost you. You run the risk that the attorney or law firm will not have the expertise to establish the required elements of an “insurance bad faith” claim and your case will be dismissed or settled for pennies on the dollar. This is actually good advice for any type of claim or legal matter. Hire an attorney whose practice is limited to the type of law involving your need for legal assistance. Do not hire a divorce lawyer for a personal injury claim. Do not hire a personal injury lawyer for a criminal matter. Would you hire an ear, nose and throat doctor to perform heart surgery? Of course not. You would hire a heart specialist. That is how you should treat legal matters. Not every lawyer is right for every legal matter. Choosing the right lawyer for an insurance claim or personal injury matter is one of the most important, if not the most important, decisions that you will make. Make sure that you take the necessary steps to hire the right lawyer for your legal needs.

“Las Vegas Injury Lawyer” tips: Do you know what your insurance policy says? It could cost you if you don’t.

May 17th, 2010

“Las Vegas injury lawyer” and “trial attorney”, Craig Murphy here with important tips for you to consider. What your insurance policy says or does not say could end up costing you a lot of money. Many companies are now placing very strict restrictions and exemptions into the language of their insurance policies. The restrictions and exclusions often run contrary to the type of insurance coverage being purchased. The restrictions and exclusions narrow the coverage to such extents that the coverage is virtually worthless in most instances. It is nothing more than a profit center for the insurance companies because they know that with the restrictions and exclusions they will virtually never have to pay. As a result, all the money that the insurance companies take in is pure profit. That profit comes at your expense and the insurance companies have little or no intent of ever having to pay the majority of the money back to policy holders.

What are some examples? Uninsured and Under Insured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage. Most people expect that when they purchase UM/UIM coverage that the insurance will pay them if they are involved in an accident and the person who caused the accident does not have any or enough insurance to cover their injuries. In such a situation, the UM/UIM coverage would become responsible to pay the policy holder for his or her injuries. That is how it has always worked. However, insurance companies are now restricting and excluding certain situations and circumstances from coverage. Under the restricted policies, the policy holder may only be eligible for coverage if the accident happens in their car, not while they are in someone elses car. Yet, most people who purchase UM/UIM coverage expect to be covered when they are hit by someone who is uninsured or does not have enough insurance, whether it is while they are in their own car, someone elses car or even when they are walking.

The question I have is whether the insurance sales persons are explaining these restrictions and exclusions. If the insurance policy is purchased over the Internet in order to get a discount, then no one has explained the restriction or exclusion. It is buyer beware. You are on your own and you are expected to know what the policy covers and what it does not cover. It really does not matter what your expectations were. The policy language controls what will be paid and when.

What can you do to protect yourself? What should you do to protect yourself? Get your insurance policies reviewed by someone who knows how to read and interpret insurance policies. Call me. I will schedule an appointment with you and review your insurance with you at no charge. I will explain the coverages you have and the restrictions and exclusions. You can then decide if you need to change companies or drop the insurance coverage.

“Las Vegas Injury Lawyer” tips: Do you need to hire an attorney for your claim?

May 6th, 2010

I recently met with a local executive. During our conversation we began to discuss my book “The Ultimate Consumers Guide to Nevada Car Crash Cases.” The executive asked me about the book. He wanted to know who would read the book and represent themselves. Of course, I knew about the book. I believe I know who wants the book and who would want to represent themselves. Yet I was intrigued by his question. So I asked why he had asked the question.

What the executive told me was important and of use to people who may be asking themselves whether or not they need to hire a lawyer to represent them in an injury claim. The executive told me that he would never consider representing himself. He went further to say that if her were injured in a car crash, he would not take the time to read my book to learn how to represent himself. He said that he was already too busy. He did not have the time to read a book and learn about the claims process. He did not have time to make telephone calls, write letters, get copies of bills and medical records, and all of the tasks necessary to present an injury claim in Las Vegas. To him, the expense of hiring a lawyer was well worth it just to avoid all of the hassles involved with presenting an injury claim.

To other people the money that a lawyer would charge to present and negotiate a claim is worth their time and effort. So you must ask yourself whether you are willing to take the steps necessary and required to present an injury claim in Las Vegas. What is the easiest way to learn what is involved in presenting your own claim? Order a copy of my book “The Ultimate Consumers Guide to Nevada Car Crash Cases.” My book will tell you what is involved. It provides a step by step explanation of the claims process and tells you what you need to know and what you need to do. But even before that, ask yourself if you are willing to take the time and do what is necessary to present your own claim. Do you have the time? Do you have the ability? Are you willing to argue with insurance adjusters? Can you handle the frustration? Can you handle the roadblocks? Will your personality allow you to stand up to the insurance company? Are you willing to negotiate and back up your position? Do you think it would be too stressful? Do you have the time available to do what is necessary during business hours? Yes during business hours. That is when insurance adjusters are available. If you want or need to negotiate with them, that is when it is done. Not all of the claim handling process is or can be done by letter. It often takes personal telephone calls. Do you have the time? Can you do it?

If you are not up to it, if you do not have the time, if you do not want the hassles, then you need to hire a lawyer. If, on the other hand, you are able and willing to handle the claims process, you may be able to handle your own claim. Not all claims require a lawyer. You need to know your limitations and abilities before you consider handling your own claim. Once you know your abilities and limitations, you need to know whether you are willing to do what is necessary to present and follow through with your claim. If you just do not want to be bothered with all that is involved, hire a lawyer. If the money you would pay to a lawyer is too much and you can do what is necessary to present your claim, you may be one of the people who can represent themselves. Once you have made the decision to represent yourself, you must then set your goals. Your goals must be reasonable and achievable. Otherwise, you will be wasting your time and you may have to hire a lawyer anyway. Before you do anything, get a copy of my book and read it. Call a couple of attorneys and talk to them. Ask questions. Educate yourself. Once you have done so, then you can properly decide if you can represent yourself or whether you need to hire a lawyer.

Do You Believe in Limited Government and Protecting the Constitution? Then You are Against Tort Reform!

May 5th, 2010

If you believe in limited government and protecting the Constitution then you are against tort reform. How can that be? Isn’t tort reform a plank of those advocating limited government and the preservation of the Constitution? A close analysis shows an inconsistency that runs contrary to the fundamental principles being espoused. Limited government means keeping government out of the lives of the people. Federal government, it is argued, should be limited to the enumerated powers set forth in the Constitution. If it is not enumerated, that is spelled out, then it is a power not given to the federal government by the Constitution and it should not be exercised by the federal government. At a minimum, the power to regulate such unenumerated powers should be left to the individual states.

In addition to the federal government not taking powers not enumerated under the Constitution, it is argued that actions to limit the rights afforded under the Constitution are not only unconstitutional, they are specifically taking away our rights. I agree. Yet most advocates of limited government and protecting the Constitution are in favor of tort reform. Tort reform means limiting the rights of our citizens to bring certain kinds of law suits and limiting the amount of damages that can be awarded to someone who has been injured due to negligence or other wrongful behavior. In essence, creating a protected class. That is contrary to the Constitution. It is contrary to limited government.

The Constitution guarantees the right to a trial by a jury. Tort reform limits that Constitutional right. Tort reforms seek to take away the Constitutional right of injured people to have their case decided by a jury. Tort reform also wants to limit the authority and power of the jury if access to the courthouse has not been blocked or limited. In either instance, the tort reform goal is to have the federal government step in (bigger government) and take away specific rights guaranteed by the Constitution (not protecting the Constitution). Clearly goals adverse to those of us who believe in limited federal government and the sanctity of the Constitution.

Tort reform also poses a more fundamental question. Why is it that juries can be trusted to decide the most important and complex criminal and business cases but in the context of an injury claim juries can not be trusted to make the right decision? A jury is capable of deciding life and death issues in criminal cases but can not be trusted to decide an injury case? A jury can decide multi-billion dollar business cases, fraud cases, infringement cases, but not injury cases? Juries are just as capable in injury cases as in any other case. Instead, the push for tort reform stems from powerful business interests and insurance companies that are seeking special treatment and protections through high paid lobbyists and well funded, multi-million dollar marketing campaigns.

As a country, we should think long and hard before we give away our constitutional rights. The jury system works. It is a cornerstone of our democracy. The rights guaranteed by the Constitution should not be limited or infringed upon. Think about it. After some thought, perhaps you will agree. Especially if you truely believe in limited government and protecting the Constitution.

I am Getting Ready for The Attacks

May 4th, 2010

I am getting ready for the attacks to begin. With the looming economic disaster to the Gulf coast area just beginning, I anticipate that the giant corporations and insurance companies will start attacking the little guys. You know, the people whose livelihoods have been ruined or injured by the oil spill. The economic damage can stem from fishermen to people selling T-Shirts on local beaches. It could include restaurants, hotels, car rental companies, to every kind of small business that depends on tourists during the summer. The oil spill will affect them all. Over the weekend, British Petroleum and its insurance companies showed their hand at howtheyt want to deal with the people. Quick, pennies on the dollar settlements. Avoid as much responsibility as possible. Has there been any out cry or press about it? No. Oil companies have some of the largest advertising budgets in the world. Do not expect any adverse press on their tactics.

However, what you should expect are attacks on the little guys. The people and the businesses most damaged and harmed. How will they be protected? Who will look out for their rights? Who will speak for them? Lawyers. So expect articles, headlines and news reports about lawyers lining up to make claims and file law suits. The huge multinational corporations and insurance companies will use every opportunity to vilify lawyers. In doing so, they will do whatever they can to avoid their responsibility to the little guys whom they have damaged most.

The tactics are common. The tactics are part of a long-term plan and many years of media manipulation. Were it not for lawyers, huge corporations would not be held accountable. They would do whatever they wanted without any repercussions. Many corporations and insurance companies push the envelope now to see what they can get away with. Without attorneys willing to stand up on the behalf of injured people, the little guys of the world, there would be no limit to corporate power. There would be no limit to corporate greed. There would be no limit to corporate irresponsibility. Even with lawyers, we see it every day. Companies blaming the victims. Taking every step to avoid responsibility. Corporations taking advantage at the expense of tax payers and the little guys.

Just watch, the attacks are going to come. When you see or hear one, know the real reason the attacks are bieng made; to reduce or eliminate the threat of responsiblity and being held accountable.